Rocket Pool Scorecard

A scorecard of how the Rocket Pool community scores itself on factors including risk, decentralization, security, and more.

About the Scorecard

Rocket Pool strives to create the most optimized community-governed liquidity staking protocol.
The principles of decentralization, permissionlessness, and censorship resistance guide protocol-wide decisions. It is these tenets that have forged decentralized finance, and it is these goals that we want to instill in Rocket Pool.
This is why we created the Rocket Pool Scoreboard. Read our scores below and feel free to share your thoughts here. Also, feel free to review other scores from organizations like the Ethereum Foundation.

Rocket Pool Scorecard Hero Image

Want to provide a comment / make a change?

Click theForum Input Linknext to each Comments section to be directed to a forum thread specifically tailored to that section.

Where Rocket Pool is Succeeding

Operators run their own nodes (no white labeling)Validator setNoneGOODForum Input LinkThere are currently over 3,488 unique operators. More info
Good PerformanceValidator setNoneGOODForum Input LinkNode operators continue to grow and maintain uptime.
Operators earning enough to maintain a profitable businessValidator setNoneGOODForum Input LinkEstimate earnings here
Withdrawal request automatically fulfilledValidator setNoneGOODForum Input LinkWithdrawals are automatic and permissionless + reward info here.
Withdrawal credentials are non-custodial and trustlessValidator setNoneGOODForum Input LinkWithdrawal info here
Node operators are disincentivized from acting maliciouslyValidator setNoneGOODForum Input LinkPenalty system in place here. Malicious node attacks currently very rare
Rocket Pool DAO can’t suddenly change the validator setValidator setNoneGOODForum Input LinkDecentralization of Rocket Pool prevents RPL holders from changing validators.
Rocket Pool governance has significant safeguardsGovernanceNoneGOODForum Input LinkGovernance has proven to be a robust safeguard for the decentralization of Rocket Pool up to this point.
Delegation is enabled in onchain Rocket Pool governanceGovernanceNoneGOODForum Input LinkLink here
Operators can permissionlessly enter the set and prove themselvesValidator setNoneGOODForum Input LinkAnyone can become a Rocket Pool validator permissionlessly and create a Minipool.

Where Rocket Pool is Okay but Could Improve

No operator has more than 1% of total stakeValidator setRPL HoldersOKAYForum Input LinkTop node operator has 1.6% of total stake. See here
Best practices in security and key managementSecurityStakersOKAYForum Input LinkDVT conversations have occurred but this technology is yet to be fully implemented.
Client DiversityValidator setRPL HoldersOKAYForum Input LinkDAO could benefit from a wider base of NOs outside of the United States, especially in Asia.
There’s a robust set of Rocket Pool governance delegatesGovernanceRPL HoldersOKAYForum Input LinkDelegates linked here

Where Rocket Pool Needs Improvement

Rocket Pool is easy to forkValidator setRPL holdersNEEDS IMPROVEMENTForum Input LinkVery little documentation around how to fork Rocket Pool
Distributed geographically and jurisdictionallyValidator setRPL holders, stakersNEEDS IMPROVEMENTForum Input Link859,040 ETH staked across 136 regions. Largest region in North America with 1,311 NOs.

Where Rocket Pool Needs Your Community Input

There is a way for stakers to resist malicious governance captureGovernanceNoneINPUT NEEDEDForum Input Link
Smart contract securitySecurityNoneINPUT NEEDEDForum Input Link
Distributed variation of on-premise infra and cloud providersValidator setNoneINPUT NEEDEDForum Input Link